L'Astrance, Hotel Lion D'Or, Troisgros, Nicolas Le Bec, Phillipe Rochat
Let me start off by offering my apologies. For the past few months I have been in the process of starting up a new business (details to be announced shortly), and I am woefully behind in posting my meals on the site. Even worse, the fall dining season is upon us and I've just returned from a week in Los Angeles and the Pacific Northwest. So before I fall so far behind that the reviews lose their relevancy, I thought that a summary of my meals, one for Europe and another one for the U.S., would be the best way to update the site and make everyone happy. Some of these meals go back as far as the 3rd week of January and run through the beginning of May. The meals are listed chronologically and the photos are posted below the reviews. In addition I have updated the photo galleries with nearly 30 new photos of chefs and dishes. Enjoy!
L'Astrance - A restaurant I never quite warmed up to. There was always a disconnect between how others felt about the restaurant and how I felt about it. Not that I thought it was bad, but I always found Pascal Barbot's cuisine to be overly simplistic. But then a chef friend of mine told me that a recent meal was terrific, so I figured I would give it one more try and I booked a lunch at the restaurant. Well his advice turned out to be spot on as Barbot wowed us with a number of dishes. A gateau of foie gras and mushrooms, which is quickly becoming his signature dish, was delicate and delicious even though it was a tad cold which slightly muffled the flavor of the foie. Then a gorgeous pair of Britanny sea scallops were served in a buckwheat emulsion with braised spinach. Look at those plump beauties! Best of all was a celery soup served with black truffle puree and parmesan mousse. Just a stunning dish and one of the best I've had this year. And Barbot's pairing of miso with red wine sauce, served on 45 day old baby Pyrenees lamb with leeks and black truffle, was an astounding feat of culinary magic as miso and red wine mix about as well as oil and water. A restaurant that deserves to have a feature review of its own. A-
Grand Hotel Lion D'Or - Your basic high quality bourgeoise meal that can often be found in the French countryside. Deserving of two Michelin stars, not three, we came for the truffle menu but they weren't offering one that evening. But there were a sufficient number of dishes on the carte that had truffles and we ordered them all in the process of organizing our own tasting menu. Highlights were an exceptionally rich and creamy chestnut soup topped with truffles, with a plate of foie foie gras, chestnuts, truffles and mache on the side. Delicious and truly decadent in a good way. A dish with a potato waffle, bone marrow, chervil and truffles was also very good. Only in France can you follow a rich foie gras dish with one that features bone marrow and feel good about yourself. Then we broke away from truffles with a delicious pigeon stuffed with forcemeat and innards and wrapped in caul fat. They even served an interesting dessert of a flan of pears bathed in a sweet curry sauce with vanilla ice cream. Superb list of wines from the Loire Valley and we drank a magnum of 1988 Charles Joguet Chinon Clos de Dioterie that was terrific. Not a place I would run back to but worth stopping at if you're in the area. Actually it might be worth travelling out of one's way just to drink through the magnums of Chinon on the list. B+
Troisgros - If one could create a scale that measured restaurants, and the scale was based on combining the quality of their cooking, the setting, and the quality and pricing of the wine list, I would quickly tell you that Troisgros is the best restaurant in the world. Fortunately for me, I have gotten to eat at the restaurant on an annual basis in conjunction with my attending the Marche au Vin in nearby Ampuis each January. Throw in a few visits on holidays and what you have is a love affair with a restaurant. But this year they let me down. As luck would have it, Michel Troisgros was in Japan on the night we were there and the kitchen wasn't haven't much luck reproducing his cuisine acidulee without him being in the kitchen. In fact the meal was so ordinary that I am having trouble recalling what we ate without looking at the photos. That is a tell for someone like me who has a photographic taste memory when the food is good. In fact I almost feel like I shouldn't post the photos but what the heck. At least the amuse of souffle potatoes with shaved truffles was superb. But Gillardeau oysters wrapped in thinly sliced beets and served in a beet gelee didn't seem to be balanced correctly. Then a roasted and flambeed blue lobster with herb butter was tasty but on the ordinary side. I've had better versions of their veal chop coated with a grain mustard crust. It was just one of those nights when the room didn't have any energy. I hope they do better when I visit after the new year. C
Nicolas Le Bec - Having been named Gault Millau's chef of the year when he was cooking at Lyon's Cour des Loges hotel, I was eager to try Nicolas Le Bec's new restaurant which is just off the Place Bellecour in the heart of the city center. The restaurant occupies what is a large space for a fine dining restaurant in France, and reminded me of what I lovingly describe as the "upper middle" in the U.S. Well sometimes you can judge a book by its cover as the quality of the cooking was more like Gotham Bar & Grill than a starred restaurant in France. Successes were a scallop in a sublime verveine broth with braised grapes and a sweet and sour clementine confit. Unfortunately the dish was served in a scallop shell and placed atop a bed of salt and every time you tried to slice the scallop, the shell went sloshing from one side of the plate to the other. One wonders if chefs ever try their own dishes after they are plated. But the sloshing wasn't the only issue with the dish. The verveine bouillon was so good that it hardly needed any other ingredients to make it a course. In fact if it was served as a soup (in a proper bowl of course) with thin slices of scallop, it would have been divine. Also on the plus side was an exceptional tranch of turbot in an inufsion of morille brunes with squid and dried figues. It was the single best piece of fish on the trip and the dish was perfectly assembled as well as perfectly balanced.
But the down side of the meal was so bad that it prevents me from recommending the restaurant. The rest of the dishes were terrible with the worst being foie gras with quince, cassis and hibiscus sauce, It was cloyingly sweet to the point of not being able to properly taste the foie. I mean look at that picture. It looks like a dish of sweet and sour pork in an old fashioned Cantonese restaurant. Cabbage stuffed with minced pork, which was formed around a truffle, which was topped with fried lettuce and then a shaved truffle before being drenched in a disgustingly overreduced and salty demi-glace, was a disaster and reminded me of the Calvin Trillin joke about restaurants trying to look important by stuffing food with other foods, and then stuffing the stuffed food with something else. I look forward to not returning. D+
Phillipe Rochat - If one could measure disappointment relative to expectations, than Phillip Rochat's restaurant in Crissier was probably the greatest culinary letdown of my life. I have been wanting to eat there for years, having missed eating at the restaurant when the great Girardet was at the helm. But to a person, everyone told me that Rochat was a great chef and the restaurant was among the best in the world. What I found was exactly the opposite. A nouvelle cuisine restaurant stuck in a time warp where the boundaries are drawn using lines made out of overreduced veal demi-glace. As always I prefer to start with the positive which arrived in the form of a tranch of foie gras topped with dried cherries from the Swiss town of Aarburg and then paired with Marc de Savoie gelee. The dish was perfectly balanced and the dried cherries had just the right amount of squoosh to them if you know what I mean, as well as being a hair tart which went perfectly with the very high quality foie. But the rest of the meal was amazingly poor. Scallops topped with artichokes, endive and lemon sorbet was an atrocity. And a reasonably good shrimp from the Gulf of Tarante was overpowered by a curry and mustard grain sauce which would have been a good match for a Siikh kebab but which completely ruined the shrimp. But the restaurant hit bottom when the sauce that coated the pig's trotters, which were stuffed into caul fat, was so salty and viscous frrom being overreduced that Rochat could out it in a can and sell it as an alternative to Quaker 10/40 motor oil. D
Next week part 2 - Gaig, Tom Aikens, L'Arnsbourg, Buerhiesel, Le Cerf and Le Meurice
thanks for these good reviews.
I have a question though: do you tell the restaurant staff when you're disappointed by a dish or several dishes? How do they react especially in France? I mean you have such an experienced palate that you might judge a 3 star dish better than lots of waiters in these restaurants, so I suppose they wouldn't understand your complaints about a sauce being too reduced etc...
this could end in an argument with the chef. So how do you act in such a situation?
Do you give them your blogg address? :)
By the way, really happy to read new posts from you. Got a bit worried the last months since I really enjoy your blog.
Greetings from Germany,
Alex
Posted by: Alexis | October 05, 2006 at 06:11 AM
I usually don't tell the staff that I am unhappy with a dish. But most of the time they can tell anway because of the chatter at the table. Or it isn't difficult to see when someone is being enthusiastic, or unenthusiastic, about what they are eating. In fact I was recently at a restaurant where the meal was uninspired and when the chef came to visit our table at the end of the meal, he didn't ask me one question about the food even though we chatted for more than five minutes. I suspect that our waiter had reported that we weren't exactly raving about the meal. But in the instances when I do tell the staff about a poorly prepared dish, they are quite knowledgable about what makes for good cuisine and they would certainly understand what an overreduced sauce is. As for telling the chefs and wait staff to read the blog, about 50% of the restaurants I visit know who I am before I get there. I have been surprised to walk into restaurants like the Fat Duck, El Bulli and others where the service staff starts chatting with me about the blog.
Posted by: Steve Plotnicki | October 08, 2006 at 01:28 PM
The photos from the middle of the page on don't enlarge. The reviews, as always, are wonderful. Sorry to hear about the disappointed visits.
Posted by: growabrain | October 15, 2006 at 01:34 AM
do you ever worry you are eatingf in the wrong places?
Posted by: roger | October 18, 2006 at 05:08 PM
What exactly do you mean when you say "eating in the wring places"?
Posted by: Steve Plotnicki | October 19, 2006 at 01:17 AM
Thanks for your answer!
well if some restaurants know you and your blog, then your reviews are biased ;) since they will make an extra effort to get a good review.
I guess this blog is your strategy to get the best out of each restaurant you visit.
Just kidding of course.
Greetings again from Germany (have you ever been in a restaurant in Germany actually?)
Alex
Posted by: Alex | October 19, 2006 at 05:36 AM
The purpose of reviews on this blog is different than the purpose of reviews in the traditional media. The traditional media is trying to experience the average meal because their average reader doesn't have a lot of dining experience and they want to know what to expect when they go to a restaurant. So anonymity is a critical factor in the way the traditional media interacts with a restaurant. But my blog is intended to appeal to people who have some practical experience as diners, or who want to learn how to be a better diner. So I try and elicit the best posssible meal a restaurant has to offer and in that context anonymity actually hurts instead of helps. As for eating in Germany, haven't been there since 1998 and I have never been to any of the important restaurants.
Posted by: Steve Plotnicki | October 19, 2006 at 12:20 PM
Hi Steve,
I am impressed that I found someone who actually has an even worse opinion of Rochat than I do. Apparently you and I both will never know how Girardet's cuisine taste(d). Though I heard he still occasionally cooks for some happy fews.
Most of the recipes are all in all more sophisticated than really interesting, and I agree with you that the Foie gras is Rochat's best. The dessert trolley was particularly disappointing (maybe the memory of Jamin is overpowering?). But mostly, the combination of approximative cooking and chef's denial was the thing that, together with a spectacular rise in prices over two years, decided me not to go a third time.
Speaking of voicing your dissatisfaction indeed, unlike you, I did express my disappointment at the unhomogenous and imperfect cooking I observed, both at my table and at others' (they were serving pintadeau carved in the dining room, so it was very apparent), and the Chef made fun of me for checking other peoples's plate and told me I should have asked them to make my sweetbreads again (and wait half an hour, with my wife having ordered different courses?).
I believe you are entitled to voice your dissatisfaction when you pay 300€ for a meal -- and that good restaurants welcome constructive criticism.
The other Swiss three-star, Rabaey, is one of the best restaurants I know. Well, reading your blog, you may not like it, because it is very Pacaud-like, more interested in perfect cooking and seasoning of exceptional products than creation of new dishes. However, based on my experience of fine dining in Europe, Rabaey makes the best pâte feuilletée ever, the best sweetbreads I know (possible deuce with Loiseau), and also, has the best butter I know. Also, the place is not party-like, but it is not nearly as sad as l'Ambroisie (it has a garden/terrace for one).
I review those on my blog julotlespinceaux.blogspot.com, in French and English (depending on the posts). You will find that we have different preferences obviously (reviewed many same restaurants: l'Astrance, Savoy, Robuchon, Pacaud...), but I believe we share an intent to give a sense of what to expect from those places and help people choosing and enjoying fine dining.
Posted by: julotlespinceaux | June 22, 2007 at 03:19 AM
I have been to Nicolas Le Bec twice, and both times it was outstanding. The second star in the 2007 Michelin was thus no surprise to me. I love that his cooking is firmly rooted in the french tradition while at the same time he introduces enough little twists and novelties to keep it interesting. I had a total of about 10 dishes there and every single one worked, with some being quite spectacular (but not a single of the dishes you had, they seem to change a lot). One of my highlights of last year. I hope you were there on a rare night off and that my experience was teh more typical one.
In two weeks I will try to go to L'Arnsbourg. My friends home in germany constantly rave about this place. I shall report back.
Posted by: georg | July 04, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Interesting blog, I just loved what you did, specially when you talk about those dishes... by the way I've got a similar blog but my blog is intended to appeal to people who have some practical experience as diners, or who want to learn how to be a better diner. 2j3j
Posted by: generic cialis | April 06, 2011 at 01:13 PM
Hi, thank you for sharing this great info. Was just browsing through the net in my office and happened upon your blog. It is really very well written and quit comprehensive in explaining with a very simple language.
Posted by: zithromax | July 27, 2011 at 07:38 AM
This restaurant just for the pictures looks so delicious woww i hope to be there and enjoy soon a dinner with my friends
Posted by: xl pharmacy | November 10, 2011 at 03:27 PM